<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Oncology - Serene</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.serenepharma.com/tag/oncology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.serenepharma.com</link>
	<description>The Leading Pharmaceutical Company in Central Asia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 12:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>The impact of age on rectal cancer treatment, complications and survival</title>
		<link>https://www.serenepharma.com/newspaper/the-impact-of-age-on-rectal-cancer-treatment-complications-and-survival/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[serene_admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 09:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.serenepharma.com/?p=6453</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Ref: Høydahl et al. BMC Cancer (2022) 22:975,  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10058-9 Background: The number of older patients with rectal cancer is increasing. Treatment outcome discrepancies persist, despite similar treatment guidelines. To offer the oldest patients optimal individually adjusted care, further knowledge is needed regarding treatment strategy and outcome. The present study aimed to evaluate treatment, postoperative complications,...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com/newspaper/the-impact-of-age-on-rectal-cancer-treatment-complications-and-survival/">The impact of age on rectal cancer treatment, complications and survival</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com">Serene</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Ref: </strong>Høydahl <em>et al. BMC Cancer (2022) 22:975,  </em>https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10058-9</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Background: </strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The number of older patients with rectal cancer is increasing. Treatment outcome discrepancies persist, despite similar treatment guidelines. To offer the oldest patients optimal individually adjusted care, further knowledge is needed regarding treatment strategy and outcome. The present study aimed to evaluate treatment, postoperative complications, and survival in older patients treated for rectal cancer.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Methods: </strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This retrospective study included all 666 patients (<em>n</em>=255 females, <em>n</em>=411 males) treated for rectal cancer at Levanger Hospital during 1980-2016 (<em>n</em>=193 &lt;65 years, <em>n</em>=329 65-79 years, <em>n</em>=144 ≥80 years). We performed logistic regression to analyse associations between complications, 90-day mortality, and explanatory variables. We performed a relative survival analysis to identify factors associated with short- and long-term survival.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Results: </strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite a similar distribution of cancer stages across age-groups, patients aged ≥80 years were treated with a non-curative approach more frequently than younger age groups. Among patients aged ≥80 years, 42% underwent a non-curative treatment approach, compared to 25% of patients aged &lt;65 years, and 25% of patients aged 65-79 years. The 90-day mortality was 15.3% among patients aged ≥80 years, compared to 5.7% among patients aged &lt;65 years, and 9.4% among patients aged 65-79 years. Among 431 (65%) patients treated with a major resection with curative intent, the 90-day mortality was 5.9% among patients aged ≥80 years (<em>n</em>=68), compared to 0.8% among patients aged &lt;65 years (<em>n</em>=126), and 3.8% among patients aged 65-79 years (<em>n</em>=237). The rate of postoperative complications was 47.6%. Pneumonia was the only complication that occurred more frequently in the older patient group. The severity of complications increased with three factors: age, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, and >400 ml perioperative blood loss. Among patients that survived the first 90 days, the relative long-term survival rates, five-year local recurrence rates, and metastases rates were independent of age.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><a href="https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/14-scaled.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/14-1024x397.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-6469" width="424" height="164" srcset="https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/14-1024x397.jpg 1024w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/14-300x116.jpg 300w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/14-768x298.jpg 768w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/14-1536x596.jpg 1536w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/14-scaled.jpg 1500w" sizes="(max-width: 424px) 100vw, 424px" /></a></figure>
</div>

<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><a href="https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/15-scaled.jpg"><img decoding="async" src="https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/15-1024x159.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-6466" width="-230" height="-35" srcset="https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/15-1024x159.jpg 1024w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/15-300x47.jpg 300w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/15-768x120.jpg 768w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/15-1536x239.jpg 1536w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/15-2048x319.jpg 2048w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/15-600x93.jpg 600w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/15-scaled.jpg 1500w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure>
</div>


<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Fig. 1 </strong>Relative survival after resection with curative intent among patients that survived 90 days (<em>N</em>=417) in different age groups. Each column represents 2.5 years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Conclusion: Patients aged ≥80 years were less likely to undergo a major resection with curative intent and experienced more severe complications after surgery than patients aged &lt;80 years. When patients aged ≥80 years were treated with a major resection with curative intent, the long-term survival rate was comparable to that of younger patients.<strong></strong></p><p>The post <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com/newspaper/the-impact-of-age-on-rectal-cancer-treatment-complications-and-survival/">The impact of age on rectal cancer treatment, complications and survival</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com">Serene</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose BCG vs Standard-Dose BCG in NMIBC</title>
		<link>https://www.serenepharma.com/newspaper/efficacy-and-safety-of-low-dose-bcg-vs-standard-dose-bcg-in-nmibc/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[serene_admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 08:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.serenepharma.com/?p=6439</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Ref: Choi S. etal., Low-dose versus standard-dose bacille Calmette–Guérin for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Investig Clin Urol.&#160;2022 Mar;63(2):140-150. Doi: 10.4111/icu.20210340. Introduction Several studies have been conducted to evaluate reducing the recurrence and progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Intravesical Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillation has demonstrated greater efficacy in...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com/newspaper/efficacy-and-safety-of-low-dose-bcg-vs-standard-dose-bcg-in-nmibc/">Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose BCG vs Standard-Dose BCG in NMIBC</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com">Serene</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Ref: </strong>Choi S. etal., Low-dose versus standard-dose bacille Calmette–Guérin for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, <em>Investig Clin Urol.&nbsp;2022 Mar;63(2):140-150. Doi: 10.4111/icu.20210340.</em></p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Introduction</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Several studies have been conducted to evaluate reducing the recurrence and progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Intravesical Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillation has demonstrated greater efficacy in these patients than the chemotherapeutic agents. However, adverse effects (AEs) have been a major cause of concern resulting in therapy withdrawal. There has been a worldwide shortage of BCG and a low-dose BCG might be a better option.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Aim</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This meta-analysis evaluated whether low-dose BCG could maintain efficacy and reduce AEs in patients with NMIBC.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Method</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Study Design</strong></h4>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</li></ul>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Treatment Strategy</strong></h4>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>The eligible RCTs were identified after an extensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus databases.</li><li>A total of 9 RCTs (n=1217) were included and the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the low and standard doses were compared.</li><li>A low dose was defined as a low volume of BCG compared with the standard BCG dose (Armand Frappier, 120 mg; Connaught, 81 mg; Danish 1331, 120 mg; modified Danish 1331, 120 mg; Tokyo 172, 80 mg).</li></ul>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Endpoints</strong></h4>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Rate of recurrence</li><li>Tumor progression</li><li>Cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate</li><li>Overall survival (OS) rate</li><li>AEs</li><li>Treatment withdrawal rate</li></ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Results</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>The recurrence rate was higher in the low-dose group,</li><li>However, tumor progression, CSS and OS was similar among the groups as seen in Figure 1.</li></ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Figure 1. Comparison of endpoints</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><a href="https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/13.jpg"><img decoding="async" src="https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/13-1024x555.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-6440" width="-358" height="-193" srcset="https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/13-1024x555.jpg 1024w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/13-300x163.jpg 300w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/13-768x416.jpg 768w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/13-600x325.jpg 600w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/13.jpg 1354w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure>
</div>


<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>The incidence of AEs was lower in the low-dose group (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.62; p&lt;0.0001).</li><li>The treatment withdrawal rate was also significantly less in the low-dose group as seen in Figure 1.</li></ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a><strong>Conclusion</strong></a><strong></strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Although low-dose BCG had higher recurrence rate than standard-dose BCG, tumor progression, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were similar between the doses.</li><li>The safety profile of low-dose BCG was better than the standard-dose as demonstrated by lesser incidence of adverse effects and lower withdrawal rate.</li><li>Low-dose BCG may be a feasible alternative in the current scenario of BCG shortage.</li></ul><p>The post <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com/newspaper/efficacy-and-safety-of-low-dose-bcg-vs-standard-dose-bcg-in-nmibc/">Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose BCG vs Standard-Dose BCG in NMIBC</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com">Serene</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effect of sleep disorders on the risks of cancers and site-specific cancers</title>
		<link>https://www.serenepharma.com/newspaper/effect-of-sleep-disorders-on-the-risks-of-cancers-and-site-specific-cancers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[serene_admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 08:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.serenepharma.com/?p=6434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Ref: Zheng S.,etal., Elsevier , Volume 100, December 2022, Pages 254-261, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2022.08.014 Purpose Whether preexisting sleep disorder is an independent risk factor for cancer remains unclear. Therefore, we performed this propensity score–matched population-based cohort study to compare the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of specific cancers between patients with and without sleep disorders. Patients and methods Patients were categorized...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com/newspaper/effect-of-sleep-disorders-on-the-risks-of-cancers-and-site-specific-cancers/">Effect of sleep disorders on the risks of cancers and site-specific cancers</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com">Serene</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ref: Zheng S.,etal., Elsevier , Volume 100, December 2022, Pages 254-261, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2022.08.014</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Purpose</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Whether preexisting sleep disorder is an independent risk factor for cancer remains unclear. Therefore, we performed this propensity score–matched population-based cohort study to compare the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of specific cancers between patients with and without sleep disorders.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Patients and methods</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Patients were categorized into two groups on the basis of the presence or absence of sleep disorders and matched at a 1:1 ratio.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Results</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Propensity score matching yielded a final cohort of 289,162 patients (i.e., 144,581 and 144,581 in the sleep disorder and nonsleep disorder groups, respectively) who were eligible for further analysis. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR; 95% confidence interval [CI]) of cancer risk in the sleep disorder group compared with the nonsleep disorder group was 1.07 (1.04–1.12; <em>P</em> = 0.0001). Furthermore, the adjusted IRRs (95% CIs) for all cancers, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer in the patients with sleep disorders were 1.08 (1.02–1.18), 1.20 (1.08–1.32), and 1.30 (1.10–1.52), respectively.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The results suggested that sleep disorders are a significant risk factor for all cancers, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Highlights</strong></h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Whether preexisting sleep disorder is an independent risk factor for cancer remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of sleep disorders on cancer incidence.</li><li>We determined the significant adjusted incidence rate ratios of the risks of all cancers, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer in patients with or without a diagnosis of sleep disorder before cancer.</li></ul><p>The post <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com/newspaper/effect-of-sleep-disorders-on-the-risks-of-cancers-and-site-specific-cancers/">Effect of sleep disorders on the risks of cancers and site-specific cancers</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com">Serene</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plasma prostasin: a novel risk marker for incidence of diabetes and cancer mortality</title>
		<link>https://www.serenepharma.com/newspaper/plasma-prostasin-a-novel-risk-marker-for-incidence-of-diabetes-and-cancer-mortality/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[serene_admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oncology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.serenepharma.com/?p=6420</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Bao X. etal., Diabetologia (2022) 65:1642–1651, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05771-w Aims/hypothesis Diabetes is associated with an increased risk of cancer. Prostasin is an epithelial sodium channel stimulator that has been associated with suppression of tumours, glucose metabolism and hyperglycaemia-associated tumour pathology. However, the association between prostasin, diabetes and cancer mortality has not been well investigated in humans. We...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com/newspaper/plasma-prostasin-a-novel-risk-marker-for-incidence-of-diabetes-and-cancer-mortality/">Plasma prostasin: a novel risk marker for incidence of diabetes and cancer mortality</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com">Serene</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bao X. etal., Diabetologia (2022) 65:1642–1651, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05771-w</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><a href="https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/12.jpg"><img decoding="async" src="https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/12-1024x632.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-6421" width="-389" height="-239" srcset="https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/12-1024x632.jpg 1024w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/12-300x185.jpg 300w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/12-768x474.jpg 768w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/12-600x370.jpg 600w, https://www.serenepharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/12.jpg 1444w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a></figure>
</div>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Aims/hypothesis</strong> </h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Diabetes is associated with an increased risk of cancer. Prostasin is an epithelial sodium channel stimulator that has been associated with suppression of tumours, glucose metabolism and hyperglycaemia-associated tumour pathology. However, the association between prostasin, diabetes and cancer mortality has not been well investigated in humans. We aim to investigate the associations between plasma prostasin and diabetes, and to explore whether prostasin has an effect on cancer mortality risk in individuals with hyperglycaemia.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Methods </strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Plasma prostasin was measured using samples from the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study Cardiovascular Cohort, and statistical analysis was performed from both sex-specific quartiles and per 1 SD. The cross-sectional association between plasma prostasin and diabetes was first studied in 4658 participants (age 57.5 ± 5.9 years, 39.9% men). After excluding 361 with prevalent diabetes, the associations of prostasin with incident diabetes and cancer mortality risk were assessed using Cox regression analysis. The interactions between prostasin and blood glucose levels as well as other covariates were tested.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Results</strong> </h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The adjusted OR for prevalent diabetes in the 4th vs 1st quartile of prostasin concentrations was 1.95 (95% CI 1.39, 2.76) (p for trend &lt;0.0001). During mean follow-up periods of 21.9 ± 7.0 and 23.5 ± 6.1 years, respectively, 702 participants developed diabetes and 651 died from cancer. Prostasin was significantly associated with the incidence of diabetes. The adjusted HR for diabetes in the 4th vs 1st quartile of prostasin concentrations was 1.76 (95% CI 1.41, 2.19) (p for trend &lt;0.0001). Prostasin was also associated with cancer mortality There was a significant interaction between prostasin and fasting blood glucose for cancer mortality risk (p for interaction =0.022), with a stronger association observed in individuals with impaired fasting blood glucose levels at baseline (HR per 1 SD change 1.52; 95% CI 1.07, 2.16; p=0.019).</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Conclusions/interpretation</strong> </h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Plasma prostasin levels are positively associated with diabetes risk and with cancer mortality risk, especially in individuals with high blood glucose levels, which may shed new light on the relationship between diabetes and cancer.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com/newspaper/plasma-prostasin-a-novel-risk-marker-for-incidence-of-diabetes-and-cancer-mortality/">Plasma prostasin: a novel risk marker for incidence of diabetes and cancer mortality</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.serenepharma.com">Serene</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
